Editorial method and source checking

Our current method uses AI assistance for research organization, drafting, factual checking and editing. We do not claim that a lawyer or an independent human reviewer reviewed these articles.

What source-checked means

Each article has a reader task, jurisdiction, primary-source dossier and claim-check notes. A separate AI pass examines the actual text and supporting passages. We distinguish a source’s revision or effective date from the day it was accessed. An HTTP success code alone is not factual support.

Practical organizational suggestions are identified as such. Legal or administrative statements are narrowed to the authority read. Unresolved substantive claims are removed, narrowed or held rather than approved by a score. Source checking is not a legal opinion, guarantee of completeness or guarantee of Google visibility.

Publication and changes

Our topic collections contain the current source-checked editorial versions. Earlier unpublished working drafts are not presented as approved legal information. Visible check dates reflect actual review records, not the date a page was rebuilt. Material source changes require a new claim check and editorial version.

Corrections and limits

Official guidance can change or omit exceptions. If you find an error, identify the article, passage and supporting authority through our editorial contact. Do not send medical or claim files. We keep the correction task separate from case intake.

Professional legal review has not been performed or claimed. Source checking does not guarantee accuracy or cover every later legal development.